~/ Understanding FOSS Licenses: A Developer's Guide

Learn what FOSS licenses are, why they matter, and the differences between popular open-source licenses.

May 28, 2025

|

5 min read

FOSS
Open Source
Licensing
Development
Software Freedom

If you're working with open-source software, you've probably come across terms like FOSS, GPL, MIT, or Apache License. But what do these licenses actually mean? How do they affect how you can use, modify, and distribute software?

In this blog, we'll break down what a FOSS license is, explore the most common types, and help you choose the right one for your project.


FOSS stands for Free and Open Source Software. A FOSS license is a legal framework that allows users to:

  • Use the software for any purpose
  • Study how the software works
  • Modify the software
  • Distribute copies of the original or modified software

These freedoms are designed to promote transparency, collaboration, and innovation.

But "free" doesn't always mean "without restrictions." Different licenses impose different rules around what you must do when you share or modify the software.


FOSS licenses generally fall into two main categories:

These licenses have minimal requirements. You can use, modify, and redistribute the software with few obligations. You don't have to use the same license in your derivative work. They're ideal for maximum flexibility and are often business-friendly.

Popular permissive licenses include:

  • MIT License
  • Apache License 2.0
  • BSD Licenses

These licenses ensure that derivative works are also distributed under the same license. If you modify and distribute the software, you must release the source code under the same terms.

Popular copyleft licenses include:

  • GNU General Public License (GPL)
  • GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)
  • Affero General Public License (AGPL)

LicenseTypeKey RequirementUsable in Proprietary Software?
MITPermissiveMust include the original licenseYes
Apache 2.0PermissiveInclude notice and do not use trademarksYes
BSDPermissiveInclude copyright and disclaimerYes
GPLCopyleftMust open source derivatives under same licenseNo
LGPLCopyleftLess strict; allows dynamic linkingYes (with conditions)
AGPLCopyleftMust release source even if software runs as a serviceNo

Here's how you might include an MIT license header in a Python script:

Py

# sample.py """ MIT License Copyright (c) 2025 Your Name Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction... """ def greet(name): print(f"Hello, {name}!")

Here are some general guidelines:

  • Use MIT or Apache 2.0 if you want your code to be widely reused, including in proprietary projects.
  • Use GPL if you want all derivative works to remain open source.
  • Use LGPL for libraries you want used in both open and proprietary software.
  • Use AGPL if you're building server software and want to ensure all modifications are shared, even when run as a service.

FOSS licenses are more than just legal jargon-they shape how software is shared, improved, and commercialized. Whether you're an open-source maintainer, contributor, or user, understanding these licenses empowers you to make informed, ethical, and strategic decisions.

Got a favorite FOSS license? Or a horror story about choosing the wrong one? Share your experience in the comments!